Honda / Acura K20a K24a Engine Forum banner

RDX Crankshaft...usable?

27K views 39 replies 20 participants last post by  Lotus  
#1 ·
So I know that Edo hosted a thread covering some info on the RDX crankshaft a little bit ago, and many people have tried to bring it back from the dead because it was of such interest.

From the other thread:

"The RDX uses a forged-steel crankshaft with a long 99mm stroke. To reduce friction and improve durability, the crankshaft journals are micropolished. Special forged connecting rods are engineered for the engine's high power output. The RDX has special alloy pistons with thick crowns and super hard Ni-P plating in the piston ring grooves to provide a long-wearing surface with extra heat resistance. A high-capacity oil pump supplies oil jets directed at the underside of the piston crowns to help dissipate heat." - Source

B/S - 86mm x 99mm
Rod Journal - 0.780"
Wt. ~37 lbs (2 lbs less than TSX Crank)
Oil Pump - 15100 RWC A02

"All journal dimensions same, all rod bearing part numbers same for both TSX & RDX. TSX uses PRB mains, RDX uses RAA mains."

*The above was summarized from the other thread for future readers

---------------------------------------------​

My question is if the RDX's crank is stronger and lighter than the TSX's, would it be safe to say that all you would need to do in order to use it is swap the cranks...or is the above write up telling me that this form of a swap would req. "special forged connecting rods", "alloy pistons with thick crowns and super hard Ni-P plating in the piston ring grooves", and the "high-capacity oil pump" with the oil squirters we already see in some K-series blocks to make it a smart, functional improvement.

And if so, do you believe it is worth while on an all motor build. The fact of the matter is I will most likely be getting custom pistons, and rods anyway for my build and I just thought...why not the RDX crank. If there is more I should know, please enlighten me.

PS - A link to a lot of RDX overview information from another forum
 
#8 ·
i've been wondering this for a while as well! i always heard it was lighter but never any of the other info mentioned here. definitely something to think about.....and not badly priced either. :up:
 
#9 ·
so.... its 2 lbs lighter. is it worth the money for an NA build? what kind of gains would that realistically net on a simple k24a2 setup with OEM pistons, and maybe some cams?

maybe this will only benefit the turbo guys that need the lighter weight AND a stronger crank. I dont see myself breaking my TSX crank anytime soon...
 
#10 ·
damn, 2lbs lighter on the rotating assembly, i'd definitely say it's worth it!
 
#14 ·
anyone know any more info on the rdx rods? are they better than tsx rods? looks that way from above post.
 
#19 ·
^^^exactly, i don't really care about hp #'s, i'm excited to feel what lighter parts on the rotating assembly feel like on the butt dyno.
 
#23 ·
Thought i'd post my interrogation here since it pertains to the RDX crankshatf...

What rod bearings would one use to run tsx rods on the RDX crank? RDX? TSX? EDIT: never mind, just re read the first post... newb... I guess the rest of the posts still is relevant.

I'm guessing it will depend on the measurements done, but then again do we use the manual for rdx or tsx (to determine the "color" of the bearing with clearance measures..)

I feel silly asking those questions since i'm no where near the beginning of the build (well I guess phase one...money gathering.. lol). But the question might help others...

Thanks!
 
#24 ·
Special forged connecting rods are engineered for the engine's high power output.
still would like to know more about the rods, if they are better than tsx rods, could be great for budget build, assuming you can find a block at salvage yard for decent price. does the k23 have same deck height as k20 or k24?
 
#28 ·
k23 and 24 have the same deck height if the cranks are transferable then the rods should be too. the only variable is the rod piston connection if it has the same geometry. i would like to see someone try this.
 
#31 ·
Bump again guys . Anyone rev this crank higher than 9k I think I've heard of the accord crank being reved to 10.5k . Since this crank is forged it should be able to rev to the moon . ?
 
#36 ·
I read on here that the 06-08 TSX crank can rev to 11k before seeing any deflection compared to the CRV crank. As for the RDX crank, sure its lighter but is it actually stronger than the TSX crank? Usually heavier means stronger.

As for saving 2 pounds, the TSX flywheel weighs 18lbs and an Exedy lightweight flywheel weighs 9lbs (I have both and took pics of them on the same scale one after the other), that's a savings of 9lbs right there and its cheaper to buy flywheel/clutch kit.

Now how cost effective would an RDX crank be over a TSX crank if people are already doing lightweight flywheels and replacing the balance shaft oil pumps with RSX pumps, anyone do the math?
Plus, I don't think I've ever seen an RDX block or crank for sale on a forum.