i talked to the guy that did this and he said it was a waste of time because you could get more out a k20 in the long run. the reason it would be cool cause it would be differentnikos said:A FWD tranny has been mated with a S2000 block... but I guess the thought was for a FWD car...
Noone in their right mind would want to convert a RWD car to FWD... That is as piointless as doing a manual to auto tranny swap on a 92 Civic CX
rsca_crx said:that photos been floating around for quite a while. it is a photoshop job. the company (i forget the name off-hand)was working on a new bellhousing casting to make everything work and swap into an elise. i'm not sure if it ever got finished or not, as i think the project slowed when the k20 started working so well across the pond, and the car got released in the states with the toyota lump.
I don't think anyone was saying that you shouldn't do it. They were probly just thinking about it themselves and decided it would be cheaper and probly less work just to stick with the K series motors in the front wheel drive cars.ralyrt said:i dont care how much power u can get, its something different my car is rear wheel drive so i dont think is are complete waste of time u can make just as much power for the right money
every1 says its better but seems no 1 2 mention anything but power
i no k20a is are better engine to make power, but hey who has 300hp f20c na rear drive me after bolt ons and soon 2 be 300kw+ atw nice big turbo :wow:
so if u still think k2oa is better, tell some 1 that cares
eviltek775. the guy that u spoke 2 did he actually do it or is he talking from his ass, if he did do it, has he got any pics,was that his only excuse
makes more power, i would except some thing like its wasnt driveable,not responsive and yeah shit like that
i have no problem wat every 1 thinks its there opion not my