|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 67
|
well i purchased some exhaust stuff to make a nice custom 3 inch exhaust on my 06 si tommorw, we are doing from the header back and elemnating the cat. its going to be all mandrel bent and running threw a big 3 chambered magnaflow 3inch muffler. we will be doing a base run and then another couple runs after the exhaust is done. i will make sure and post the results tommorow night.
![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
K20a.org Advanced User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: T.O.
Posts: 757
|
Sounds like some good first mods. Keep us posted.
__________________
www.defcon-racing.com Mark Botelho 1999 K20A GS-R Ontario solosprints car #362 2007 SGT1 class champion..Owner/Driver 2000 Honda Civic Hatchback Regional Roadrace car #363 GT Sprints...Co-driver |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
K20a.org Basic User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brampton, ON, CA
Posts: 171
|
From what I've read, the 06 Si has a resrictive header. Any plans for a new header?
Since your doin the whole exhaust thing why not do the header at the same time? This way you can match the length of the header to the exhaust. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 67
|
my base line is 186.5whp and 139wtq, im going back to dyno the difference monday, i will let you know what happens
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 32
|
Can you post the dynograph?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 67
|
Ok i finnally had a chance to dyno the difference of the custom exhaust. First off those original number were uncorrected so that 186.47whp and 139wtq SAE corrected is 183.67whp and 136.48wtq. Im giving the difference SAE corrected that way noone can talk smack, these are the low #'s. After the exhaust the power jumped to 188whp and 143.5wtq, with a TQ gain of over 10lbs at 6000rpms. But basically i gained around 5whp and 8wtq SAE corrected on a dynojet dyno. Keep in mind this is on a bone stock SI with no tuning or other mods at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 67
|
here are the dynos, the one that shows a comparison is stock vs 3'' exhaust they read alittle lower than the baseline dyno casue they are SAE corrected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
K20a.org Basic User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: littleton
Posts: 272
|
So I know i have posted this before. Is not back pressure good? Three inch is kinda big with no turbo?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 32
|
Very nice. It appears the K20Z3's power falls off a bit later than the K20Z1. Great numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
K20a.org Basic User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 273
|
wow before vtec that thing looks god awful. Get some Kpro and that thing would really wake up.
__________________
Nrg-tech racing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 32
|
Yeah I noticed that as well. The VTEC crossover point is VERY evident.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
K20a.org Advanced User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: up your but n around the corner
Posts: 778
|
Quote:
welcome to the K series where a 2.5" exhaust will loose you 20 hp and to the original poster..i gaurintee you, that if you get a header and k pro you'll put down 210...what do you say guys?
__________________
INTENSE MOTORSPORTS 2009 T/S car in the works Intense Motorsports 1006 E Cummings Ave Catonsville, MD 21228 410-299-4286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
blasting heat 36000km
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,777
|
Back pressure is the devil. The whole myth that back pressure helps low end power is just that, a myth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
K20a.org Basic User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: st. louis
Posts: 220
|
from what ive read the kpro is not desighned to coralate with the new gauges so you would have to choose between gauges or kpro but that is just what i have read hopefully they will be able fix that problem so i can get a kpro for my new civic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
K20a.org Basic User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 369
|
i dont think soo that a 2.5 " exhaust on a stock k20a2 is too small, 3 " is way too big for sure, i dynoed my k20a2 stock with a 2.5 exhaust custom and a catalytic oem k20a2 modified, on a mustang dyno, 186 whp a 132 lbs of torque i am pretty sure on a dynopack or dynojet i would make arround 192-194 whp, without tuning, keep in mind that the k-pro will give you 10 whp. 204 whp exemple + header dtr = 215-220 whp + rbc intake manifold = 235 whp-240 + ips k2 cams = 255 whp easily with a stock bottem end add 12:1.1 compression forged pistons and wow you hit the 265-270 whp for sure, and keep in mind too that the k20a2 spin up faster than a k24, the stroke take too many time to turn up the crank, k20a2 stroke are faster and better
__________________
K20a2 Ep3 2003 on Brembo. -- Rsx 2002 Premium on type-s. Next car coming Nsx 1998 T |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|